Part 1:
Introduction to
Mortgage Market Trends
rising non-bank influence, shifting loan purposes, disparities in access by race, and how these trends shape who gets to buy a home in America today
Part 1 of this series will examine fundamental shifts in mortgage credit providers and loan programs serving racially and ethnically diverse communities. It will also track the rise of non-bank lenders, changing distribution of loan purposes and how government backed programs remain crucial for many borrowers of color despite declining overall market share.
Jason Richardson, Senior Director, Research, NCRC
Key Takeaways
1
Non-banks exempt from Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) oversight now make an outright majority of mortgages nationwide. Non-bank mortgage companies now originate 53.3% of all home loans (up from 44.6% in 2018), while bank market shares have fallen from 42.5% to 30.1%. This shift thwarts Congress’s attempts to drive loan capital into communities that were historically fenced out of the financial services system, because non-bank lending is not accountable to regulators under the CRA.
2
Two-thirds of mortgages to purchase a new home were made by non-bank lenders in 2024. Different institutions dominate specific loan types with mortgage companies leading in home purchases (66.1%) and cash out refinances (67.3%). Banks maintain strength in home improvement loans (48.2%) and equity loans (42.6%).
3
Total mortgage lending has collapsed dramatically since the COVID-19 pandemic. Loan originations plummeted from a peak of 16.8 million in 2021 to just 4.6 million in 2023, with refinancing collapsing by over 90% from pandemic peaks.
4
Institution Specific Trends: Credit unions show the strongest reliance on conventional lending (96.6%), compared to banks (90.5%) and mortgage companies (60.6%), which utilize government-backed programs more frequently.
Discussion
The mortgage market has undergone significant structural changes since 2018, reflecting both pandemic-related economic shifts and longer term trends in financial services. The 30-year fixed mortgage rate in the United States has experienced significant volatility over the past 25 years, starting around 8% in 2000, then dropping to historic lows of under 3% during the height of the 2020-2021 COVID-19 pandemic era. It then climbed sharply to peak at nearly 8% in late 2023, before moderating to around 6.8% by early 2025.
Non-bank mortgage companies have emerged as the dominant force in home lending, particularly for home purchases and cash-out refinances. They have increased their market share from 44.6% in 2018, experiencing a peak of 60.8% in 2021 before settling at 53.3% in 2024.
This fundamental shift in who provides mortgage credit to American homebuyers threatens to undermine efforts to close economic opportunity gaps along race and class lines. This shift means that lenders can sidestep critical consumer protections, like the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).
Banks have seen their overall market share decline substantially from 42.5% in 2018 to just 30.1% by 2024. However, banks still continue to play an important role in home improvement and equity lending. Meanwhile, credit unions have grown their presence from 13.0% to 16.6% over the same period, showing resilience during market fluctuations. Credit unions, however, are also not subject to the same CRA oversight as traditional banks.
The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented volatility in lending activity. Total loan originations more than doubled between 2019 and 2021, reaching historic peaks of 16.8 million loans driven by historically low interest rates. As rates climbed post-pandemic, lending contracted sharply to 6.7 million originations in 2022 and just 4.6 million in 2023. Despite these extreme volume swings, the origination rate (percentage of applications resulting in loans) remained surprisingly stable, suggesting lending standards stayed consistent throughout the market turbulence.
Different types of lenders have developed specialized niches within the mortgage ecosystem, as shown in the charts below. While all institutions experienced significant drops in volume since 2021, their composition of loan types reveals distinct business models and market approaches.
The composition of mortgage lending has shifted significantly since 2018, with refinancing activity dominating during the 2020-2021 period before sharply declining. The chart below quantifies this dramatic volume change, where total lending peaked near 12 million units during the 2020-2021 period before falling to approximately 5 million units by 2023 (less than half the peak volume).
Home purchases (shown in gray) have maintained the most consistent volume throughout this period, while refinance activity (shown in blue) experienced the most pronounced boom and bust cycle, driving both the overall market expansion and subsequent contraction. This volume data reinforces our findings about the unprecedented market volatility during and after the pandemic period.
Banks maintained a heavy emphasis on providing conventional loans, which make up 83.5% of their home purchase lending. This conventional loan focus has remained consistent even as overall volumes declined dramatically after 2021.
Credit unions represent a third distinct category in the mortgage lending landscape, although they handle the smallest overall volume of loans compared to banks and mortgage companies. What makes credit unions stand out is their overwhelming focus on conventional lending, which makes up 88.1% of their home purchase mortgage activity and 96.6% of all of their lending. They use government-backed loan programs, such as FHA loans and Rural Housing Service (RHS) housing assistance programs, less frequently than any other lender group.
There is one notable exception to this pattern: Veterans Affairs (VA) loans for military service members and veterans. A single institution – Navy Federal Credit Union (NFCU) – dominates this specialized market, accounting for 76% of all VA loans issued by credit unions in 2024. This concentration shows how one large credit union has carved out a specific niche serving military members, while most other credit unions primarily stick to conventional lending.
The data reveals significant disparities in how different institutions access the mortgage market. Government-backed programs (i.e., FHA, VA, RHS, etc.) remain crucial for many borrowers despite their declining overall market share. In 2024, while 78.3% of all home purchase mortgages were conventional loans, the remaining 21.7% of government-backed loan programs played an outsized role in serving many communities.
Recent policy changes have affected investor confidence, pushing bond yields to higher rates and increasing mortgage costs. The housing market remains central to these long term shifts, with lending activity both reflecting and influencing broader economic trends.
Policy Solutions
1
Extend CRA Requirements to Non Bank Lenders
Given recent efforts to weaken federal fair lending protections, and the increasingly dominant role of less-supervised lenders in the mortgage market, states must defend their residents through these expanded CRA frameworks. Implementing state-level Community Reinvestment Act legislation similar to current models operating in Massachusetts, New York and Illinois would cover all mortgage lenders, including now dominant non-bank institutions. Previous NCRC studies have shown that state CRA laws effectively increased lending to underserved communities and provide crucial accountability mechanisms for lending institutions.
2
Defend Down Payment Assistance Programs
Policymakers should fight to preserve home mortgage down payment assistance programs for low-income homebuyers, which are currently under attack from federal regulators. Recent directives have forced government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) to terminate programs helping borrowers with limited savings. State and local governments must maintain these vital pathways to homeownership while advocating for federal policy reversals. As interest rates have risen, borrowers need these funds to more effectively buy down their rates as well.
3
Defend CFPB Enforcement
Policymakers should resist attempts to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which has faced recent operational challenges under acting leadership. State-level public servants need to remain vigilant against the potential relaxation of consumer protections that will enable discriminatory lending practices.
Series Introduction
Methods and Definitions
Data Sources
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) Data: Primary data source covering national mortgage lending patterns from 2018-2024, representing approximately 88% of all mortgage applications processed annually
US Census Bureau Data: Used for demographic information, population statistics, and income data including the American Community Survey and Decennial Census data
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Data: Source for HMDA data collection and release
Brookings Institution Research: Referenced for demographic projections and population growth analysis
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council: Source for HMDA data products
Analysis Period and Scope
Time Frame: 2018-2024
Loan Types Analyzed: Focus on home purchase loans for owner-occupied, site-built, 1-4 unit properties except as noted
Data Processing Methods
Race/Ethnicity Calculation: Detailed subgroup identification method that prioritizes specific ethnic codes (11-14 for Hispanic subgroups, 21-27 for Asian subgroups, 41-44 for Pacific Islander subgroups) over broader categories
Missing Data Treatment: “No Data” loans excluded from demographic calculations rather than treated as a separate racial category
Year-over-Year Comparisons: Multi-year data compared using identical calculation methods across the 2018-2024 period
Key Metrics and Definitions
Low- and Moderate-Income Borrower (LMIB): Borrowers with household income below 80% of area median income
Low- and Moderate-Income Census Tract (LMICT): Geographic areas where median family income is at or below 80% of metro area median family income
Majority-Minority Census Tract (MMCT): Census tracts where racial/ethnic minorities comprise more than 50% of residents
Cost Per Dollar: Calculated as (Total Payments Over 30 Years + Closing Costs) ÷ Original Loan Amount
Market Share: Percentage of total loans in a market originated by a specific lender
Calculation Formulas
Percentage Calculations:
- Low and moderate-income borrower percentages: (LMIB/Total Loans) × 100
- LMI Tract percentages: (LMICT/Total Loans) × 100
- Majority-minority tract percentages: (MMCT/Total Loans) × 100
- Race and ethnicity percentages: (Race group/(Total Loans-No Data)) × 100
Data Quality and Limitations
Coverage Limitations: Analysis limited to loans with reported demographic data (approximately 4.7 million of 5.3 million total loans in 2024)
Census Boundary Changes: 2020 Census redrew neighborhood boundaries, affecting historical comparisons for majority-minority tract analysis starting in 2022
Missing Data Impact: Growing number of loans without demographic data affects trend analysis accuracy
Multiracial Identity Challenges: Difficulty measuring lending equity for people identifying as multiple races
Terms
AAPI – Asian American and Pacific Islander: Demographic label that groups together Asian and Pacific Islander communities
AHO – Access to Home Ownership: Office of Hawaiian Affairs program that guarantees portions of home loans for Native Hawaiian first-time homebuyers
CDFI – Community Development Financial Institution: Specialized lenders focused on serving underserved communities
CFPB – Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Federal agency that oversees mortgage lending and consumer financial protection
CRA – Community Reinvestment Act: Federal law requiring banks to meet credit needs of their entire communities, especially low-income areas
FHA – Federal Housing Administration: Government agency that insures mortgages
GSE – Government-Sponsored Enterprise: Companies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that buy mortgages from lenders
HMDA – Home Mortgage Disclosure Act: Federal law requiring lenders to report detailed mortgage lending data
HoPI – Hawaiian or Pacific Islander: Demographic category for Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander populations
HUD – US Department of Housing and Urban Development: Federal agency that oversees housing programs
IHBG – Indian Housing Block Grant: Federal program funding housing development on tribal lands
LEI – Legal Entity Identifier: Unique identification code for financial institutions
LMI – Low- and Moderate-Income: People or areas with incomes at or below 80% of area median income
LMIB – Low and Moderate-Income Borrower: Borrowers with incomes below 80% of area median income
LMICT – Low- and Moderate-Income Census Tract: Geographic areas where median incomes fall below 80% of regional average
MIP – Mortgage Insurance Premium: Monthly fee paid by FHA borrowers to protect lenders against default
MMCT – Majority-Minority Census Tract: Neighborhoods where racial/ethnic minorities make up more than 50% of residents
RHS – Rural Housing Service: USDA program providing housing assistance in rural areas
VA – Veterans Affairs: Government department that provides benefits to military veterans, including mortgage guarantees
YoY – Year-over-Year: Comparison between the same period in consecutive years
The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data is collected and released each year by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). This dataset offers unparalleled details about 88% of the mortgage applications processed each year. This information is critical for any regulator, advocate or lender that wants to understand the market. Data of this kind promotes fair and efficient markets.
This series of research briefs will offer a deep analysis of this data and help policymakers, the general public and National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) members understand current mortgage market trends at the local level. There are a great number of topics that this data will help us explore via a series of episodes with easy to understand reports, policy suggestions, videos, data visualizations and maps. These insights can help various organizations and market actors to utilize this data to support fair lending programs and initiatives in their communities.
There were several key takeaways and findings in the 2024 HMDA data that we will discuss in future episodes. This introduction and summary will be updated as new episodes in this series are published.
Key Takeaways
Key Findings
- Declining Low-Income Access: Lending to low- and moderate-income borrowers fell to 14.2% in 2024 (the lowest level since 2018), reflecting severe affordability challenges.
- Hispanic Market Growth: Hispanic borrowers now exceed their population share in mortgage lending, reaching 17.7% of home purchase loans in 2024.
- Persistent Black Homeownership Gap: Black borrower participation remains stagnant at 8.9% (well below their 11.7% share of the adult population), with declining shares in major metro areas.
- Less-Regulated Lenders Displacing Banks: Mortgage companies and credit unions – whose lending activity is not covered by key economic opportunity laws like the Community Reinvestment Act – have greatly expanded their share of lending. Mortgage companies are making ⅔ of home purchase loans in 2024. Credit unions are now making more cash out refinance loans than banks and hold nearly the same share of the home equity market that banks do, without the oversight offered by the CRA..
Access and Affordability
Low- and moderate-income (LMI) home purchase lending continues its long decline, now at just 25.8% of all home purchases on owner occupied, 1-4 unit site built homes. Upper income borrowers dominate homebuying, even in LMI and majority minority census tracts.
Demographic Shifts
Hispanic borrowers continue to expand their market presence, and in 2024 for the first time on record were slightly over-represented in home purchase lending relative to overall population share. 17.7% of loan originations in 2024 went to a Hispanic borrower, exceeding the 16.8% percent of the overall adult population who identify as Hispanic. In contrast, the Black borrower share of the market remains well below their population representation (8.9%), with declines in key markets like Atlanta, Houston and Washington, DC.
Resources
For the complete series, including videos, interactive visualizations and localized market analysis, visit our 2025 Mortgage Market series homepage . NCRC members can request customized community data requests as well. Those interested in membership benefits should contact Ralph Cyrus (Membership Engagement Specialist) at rcyrus@ncrc.org.
Mortgage Market Series
Subscribe
Get NCRC news and
alerts by email.